MSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171120
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 15:08
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 715
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.5% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 106
Parallax 96.6
82% 101 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 94.1
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2035 885 899 961 975 948 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 2,286
Mixed 1,515
SusWrite 1,117
357% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.6
211% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 847
636% 850 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 227%
Great: 298%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 157 156 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 130
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 155
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 138 136 136 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 136
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 124 125 124 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 98.6
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 125
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 97%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 129GB
43GB free, PID 0153
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 21 20 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 65.5
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 19.8
35% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA07A DELL U2412M
Typical Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback