Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 317%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics299% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive415% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 201
2-Core 398
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 960
89% 744 Pts
64-Core 2,656
164% 2,656 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$960
Asus(1043 88D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 427
Parallax 469
372% 451 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 370
Splatting 263
302% 386 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 299%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2700 2806 2857 2840 2874 2877 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2970
Mixed 2,834
SusWrite 2,826
630% 2,782 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.2
259% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,376
1,036% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 415%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2908 2897 2914 2877 2897 2914 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2512
Write 2,979
Mixed 2,846
SusWrite 2,901
636% 2,810 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 78.2
258% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,666
DQ Write 1,304
DQ Mixed 1,455
1,097% 1,475 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 424%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6000Z40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
265% Outstanding
MC Read 171
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 71.7
294% 103 GB/s
SC Read 50.7
SC Write 75.6
SC Mixed 58.5
176% 61.6 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 265%
Great: 265%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 32" 1280 720 DEL428B DELL G3223Q
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback