MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180822
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$253
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 993
92% 767 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$495
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 208
Parallax 200
182% 210 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 153
Splatting 136
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 12 4 13 10 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 339
Write 241
Mixed 171
SusWrite 34.7
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 10.8
39% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 27.3
26% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 55%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
154GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 117 117 122 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 114
SusWrite 119
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 27
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 99.2
74% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 133%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 129 85 36 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 90.2
163% 126 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1
410% 5.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
397% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 100%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-22GXCB0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 129 87 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 140
Write 135
Mixed 110
SusWrite 93.2
159% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA MG09ACA18TE 18TB
10TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 129 88 45 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.5% Very good
Read 226
Write 252
Mixed 125
SusWrite 93.2
226% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
231% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 17.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G3R3B
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback