ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120320
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '14 at 11:27
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 110 2-Core 219 74% 164 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 412 51% 390 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 40GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 81 145787660 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3382 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 279593999 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32922 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2148 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 31 30383270854696 (C2) HDA temperature 40 69 51539607592 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 52 5851306 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	52.5% Above average	Read 272 Write 154 Mixed 219 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 19.5 81% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 22.6 59% 122 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 45%
Sandisk P4 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 7GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 104 104 55878353565 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 855 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30570 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 622 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2187 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2187 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 240518889513 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7	17.6% Very poor	Read 148 Write 91.3 Mixed 76.3 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 3.64 4K Mixed 2.54 22% 5.66 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 52%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 537GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13329 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1703 (AB) Unknown 100 100 54 (AC) Unknown 100 100 3612240 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 19 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 54 100 0 (E8) Unknown 95 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7912242172 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3815748915	36.6% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 62.3 Mixed 56.8 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 42%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 159GB free Max speed: Unknown Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 63 Mixed 70.4 51% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 47%
array 640GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 40GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6577 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 318 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 34 171799937058 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	51.5% Above average	Read 87.7 Write 91 Mixed 80.3 65% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.29 4K Mixed 0.38 120% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 76%
WDC WD12 00BEVS-60UST0 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 56GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 30.4 Mixed 9.86 29% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.27 75% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 27%
SAMSUNG MP0804H 80GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 30GB free, PID 0207 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 24.1 Mixed 11.5 25% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.26 41% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 14%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z68AP-D3 Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	371x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	242x
Core i7-2600Intel $91Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	169x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $88Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	388x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	294x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	174x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback