PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T7600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T7600 (all builds) |
Memory | 189.1 GB free of 255.992 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190630 |
Uptime | 20.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 26 '23 at 23:36 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
175%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung-00CE M386B4G70DM0-YK04 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
72%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 43 | 6 | 60 | 27" | 1960 1129 | DPL2700 DP |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 94x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 76x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples | 75x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 39x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $90 |