Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 216
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 612
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 39.8
34% 41.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.9
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 441
Mixed 350
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 46.9
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 356
265% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
861GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 189 193 189 192 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 111
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 190
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
74GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 65 62 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 69.2
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 64.1
54% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
224% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 63%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
29GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 124 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 75
Write 70.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 123
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 1042 1.5TB
9GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 55 55 56 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 59.3
Write 60.3
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 54.9
72% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 42%
ST1000DX 001-1CM162 1TB
97GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 118 113 114 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 185
Write 137
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 114
165% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.5
261% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB
8GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 118 112 114 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 129
Write 124
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 114
150% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback