bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory110GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 110GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory99.4 GB free of 109.951 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 18:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 59.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 213
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 844
75% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,571
97% 1,571 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 203 175 184 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 274
Mixed 373
SusWrite 191
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 77
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 40.6
185% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 50.2
45% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 378GB
336GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 295 290 307 308 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 491
Write 500
Mixed 502
SusWrite 299
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 37.5
121% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 131
98% 131 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 122GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 66
178% 62.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 27.5
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 153%
Great: 364%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 1 32 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback