HP 20-c205il

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 20-c205il  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81BB
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 04:35
Run Duration502 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3060
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 80
1-Core 1.1
2-Core 2.6
27% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 1.1
8-Core 1.6
0% 1.35 Pts
64-Core 0.5
0% 0.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
314GB free
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 178 173 155 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.9% Poor
Read 204
Write 193
Mixed 191
SusWrite 171
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 5.9
24% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 99%
CT240BX500SSD1 240GB
209GB free (System drive), PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 30 20 28 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 23.6
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
66% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
1.83% Terrible
MC Read 0.1
MC Write 0.2
MC Mixed 0
0% 0.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.2 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 2 0 0" 1280 720
Typical 20-c205il Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 20-c205il

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback