HP ZBook 15v G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15v G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 847B
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230807
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 13:41
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 25
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 107
34% 64 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 290
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 847B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3758
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 15.9
13% 16.6 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 493 497 439 329 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 943
Write 512
Mixed 256
SusWrite 425
118% 534 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 13
48% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 168
135% 194 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical ZBook 15v G5 Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15v G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback