Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8217
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 331
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8217) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 30.3
24% 32.3 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 19.5
22% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT-128G-1006 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 4.8 35 22 6.6 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 50
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 14.6
12% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 150 4 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15D3
Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback