Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 318%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 414%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics276% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive659% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 05:21
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$470
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 216
2-Core 429
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 851
8-Core 1667
149% 1,259 Pts
64-Core 3,725
230% 3,725 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 240E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
276% Outstanding
Lighting 369
Reflection 453
Parallax 727
301% 516 fps
MRender 516
Gravity 309
Splatting 467
355% 431 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 276%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$224
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6061 1998 2056 1160 1231 1211 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
659% Outstanding
Read 7,593
Write 8413
Mixed 3,878
SusWrite 2286
1,239% 5,543 MB/s
4K Read 89.9
4K Write 300
4K Mixed 135
468% 175 MB/s
DQ Read 1,853
DQ Write 1,338
DQ Mixed 1,664
1,225% 1,618 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 659%
Great: 926%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
657GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3439 3447 3442 2190 1559 1557 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
485% Outstanding
Read 2,942
Write 3515
Mixed 3,194
SusWrite 2,606
693% 3,064 MB/s
4K Read 86.8
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 125
411% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,964
DQ Write 1,632
DQ Mixed 1,792
1,344% 1,796 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 485%
Great: 477%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
934GB free
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1233 1233 1233 1233 1233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,440
Write 1,246
Mixed 1,173
SusWrite 1233
286% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 79.4
279% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 744
543% 704 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 250%
Great: 310%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3533 3531 3533 3533 3533 3533 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
551% Outstanding
Read 3,024
Write 3,604
Mixed 3,230
SusWrite 3,533
758% 3,348 MB/s
4K Read 87.1
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 130
437% 160 MB/s
DQ Read 1,924
DQ Write 1,608
DQ Mixed 1781
1,330% 1,771 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 551%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F164x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 44.6
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 46.3
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 43.4
128% 44.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 267%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7232 Odyssey G70B
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback