Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 18:26
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 126
61% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 206
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.57
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 39.3
34% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 38.2
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.5% Very poor
Read 178
Write 38
Mixed 83.2
22% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.58
4K Write 8.32
4K Mixed 5.63
20% 6.51 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 5.19
14% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
898GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 176
Mixed 141
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.37
142% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB-3.0 2TB
476GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 116
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.16
73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback