Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 303%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 394%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics269% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory113.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 03:19
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$529
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 216
2-Core 412
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 845
8-Core 1,609
146% 1,227 Pts
64-Core 3,662
227% 3,662 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
269% Outstanding
Lighting 348
Reflection 493
Parallax 804
284% 548 fps
MRender 519
Gravity 314
Splatting 482
362% 438 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 269%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2234 2212 2240 2217 2215 1922 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 2,173
458% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 80.2
292% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,807
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1546
1,168% 1,575 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 363%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 488 485 485 442 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 488
Mixed 414
SusWrite 466
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.1
207% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 366
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
142GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 178 81 84 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 497
Mixed 451
SusWrite 167
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 55.3
193% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
66GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,746
Write 1,953
Mixed 1,831
413% 1,843 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 71.4
244% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,937
DQ Write 1,560
DQ Mixed 1,595
1,235% 1,697 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
193GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 100
SusWrite 84.8
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5600Z40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
224% Outstanding
MC Read 167
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 55.3
253% 88.5 GB/s
SC Read 45.1
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 43.6
129% 45.1 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 224%
Great: 224%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 219 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3431 HP 24w
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback