Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory38.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$173
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 71.7
1-Core 174
2-Core 335
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,032
100% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,520
94% 1,520 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Asus(1043 8908) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 175
Parallax 114
106% 140 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 121
Splatting 98
104% 131 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 104%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 407
Mixed 9.2
66% 304 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
228GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1663 1054 776 777 775 776 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 1,756
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 970
384% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 87.1
288% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 1,163
877% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 302%
Great: 346%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
822GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 164 163 159 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 161
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 24.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 23
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 DEL427F DELL G2722HS
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback