Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70-$4 495 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 55.8 31% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 55.6 8-Core 57.2 8% 56.4 Pts	64-Core 57.3 4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0166) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 4 Parallax 1 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 209 Write 137 Mixed 172 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 5.45 36% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 11.3 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 5.24 7% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 83%
Imation USB Flash Drive 0GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 0063 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.97% Terrible	Read 7.48 Write 6.9 Mixed 4.83 8% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.29 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.19 25% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70AMD $4Bench 30%, 495 samples	6x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples	5x
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $20Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
AS330 120GBApacerBench 76%, 735 samples	1x
hynix SC311 SATA 128GBSKBench 65%, 20,313 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $24