Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 20:49
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 906
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 64.9
54% 67.4 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 64
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,380
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,479
442% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 63.6
205% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 953
710% 949 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
St16000n M000J-2TW103 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 139 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 159
Write 191
Mixed 202
SusWrite 138
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 0.9
29% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 0.4
3% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 154 148 144 149 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
506GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 131 127 128 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate ST16000NM000G-2K 16TB
425GB free
Firmware: CMD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 218 219 225 227 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
100GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 122 121 120 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate ST16000NM000G-2K 16TB
1TB free
Firmware: CMD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 113 114 124 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 141 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 21.7
Write 135
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 140
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 102%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
4GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.5
Write 72
Mixed 58.7
86% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 9.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 27" 1280 720 MSI3CC3 MSI G271C
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 16,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $345

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback