Today's hottest deals

Asrock B650E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 288%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics293% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive502% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock B650E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650E Taichi
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 05:45
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$476
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 335
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 651
8-Core 1,096
106% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 102%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
293% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 440
Parallax 553
369% 482 fps
MRender 416
Gravity 460
Splatting 229
288% 368 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 293%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 1TB-$125
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4902 4860 1767 1050 1263 1344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
502% Outstanding
Read 4,801
Write 5,030
Mixed 2565
SusWrite 2,531
836% 3,732 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 81.1
281% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,342
DQ Mixed 1,621
1,192% 1,571 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 502%
Great: 691%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
6TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 340 344 345 345 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 350
Write 342
Mixed 316
SusWrite 343
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 33.6
116% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 227
172% 233 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 129%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 242 243 240 245 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 250
Mixed 113
SusWrite 242
155% 212 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.7
340% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6400 C32 2x32GB-$220
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
196% Outstanding
MC Read 74.1
MC Write 71.3
MC Mixed 72.9
208% 72.8 GB/s
SC Read 52.9
SC Write 65.6
SC Mixed 57.7
168% 58.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 196%
Great: 229%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 27" 1280 720 AUS2705 VG27AQL1A
Typical B650E Taichi Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO

System: Asrock B650E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback