PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20131219 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 26 '23 at 03:06 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | CRI-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
54.5%
Above average
|
52% 92.4 Pts
|
50% 422 Pts
|
63% 1,011 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
12% 19.7 fps
|
17% 20.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 108 78 74 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
37% 167 MB/s
|
56% 21.1 MB/s
|
45% 85.3 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
72GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 72 72 74 73 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
48% 65.7 MB/s
|
102% 0.63 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C-RD 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.3%
Average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
18% 6.2 GB/s
|
28% 143 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 57 | 60 | 23.1" | 1280 720 | HWP327C HP E240c |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 151x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 131x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 173x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |