Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics218% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230815
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 16:58
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$540
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 213
2-Core 426
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,598
143% 1,208 Pts
64-Core 3,808
236% 3,808 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,035
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
218% Outstanding
Lighting 325
Reflection 306
Parallax 340
265% 324 fps
MRender 368
Gravity 261
Splatting 192
214% 274 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 218%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,027
Write 4,636
Mixed 3,455
835% 3,706 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 105
356% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,470
DQ Mixed 1,634
1,218% 1,618 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 509
Write 493
Mixed 417
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.7
212% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 365
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 518
Write 493
Mixed 442
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56.5
195% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
396GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,824
Write 2,200
Mixed 1,605
489% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 87.4
321% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,481
DQ Write 1,642
DQ Mixed 1,611
1,199% 1,578 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 54.4
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 43.6
SC Write 60
SC Mixed 47.7
144% 50.4 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 152%
Great: 295%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 27" 1280 720 APP9226 LED Cinema
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $2,400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback