Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 240 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 634 66% 529 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 087D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 8.5 5% 8.1 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 13 9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS2140 2TB SSD 336 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CS214800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1917 1938 1912 882 136 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,143 Write 1895 Mixed 1,137 SusWrite 1,153 302% 1,332 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 42.2 139% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 563 DQ Write 413 DQ Mixed 469 356% 482 MB/s
Poor: 174% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 385%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TN432G26D819 2x31.5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.5% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 22.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	15.5"	1280 720	SHP148D

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,660x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	367x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	310x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	313x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	151x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	150x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	336x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	292x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	154x