Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS_GX531GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus Zephyrus S GX531GS_GX531GS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX531GS
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 18:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 667
69% 553 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1CCE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 630 653 440 364 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 546
Write 500
Mixed 641
SusWrite 563
127% 562 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 41.5
133% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 730
547% 732 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 130%
Great: 148%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 66 64 66 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 65.5
126% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK01 1TB
109GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 68.4
Write 48.1
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 0.2
48% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK02 480GB
77GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
Read 169
Write 98.4
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 0.6
102% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 8.9
827% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 9.7
787% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 118%
JMicron Generic DISK03 320GB
87GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 66 64 65 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 93.7
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 64.8
98% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
JMicron Generic DISK04 240GB
7GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 362
Write 346
Mixed 28.3
280% 246 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 1.1
476% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
962% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1536 793 AUO82ED
Typical Zephyrus S GX531GS_GX531GS Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS_GX531GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback