HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory18.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '17 at 12:20
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 167
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 626
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 1,221
76% 1,221 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 44.5
38% 45.2 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
200GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 92.1
Mixed 83.3
66% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.52
102% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 75%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: 06.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 73.6
Write 74.4
Mixed 49.7
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.33
85% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 101
Mixed 51
102% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 4.87
4K Mixed 0.39
182% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BDFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback