Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH580
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 00:58
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 61.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 343
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 878
99% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,600
99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1A58 201B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 181
Parallax 32.8
20% 79.3 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 21.7
22% 28.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3204 2746 1689 1764 1762 1761 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,680
Write 3,409
Mixed 2,764
SusWrite 2,154
622% 2,752 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 98.1
322% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1,319
962% 1,258 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 394%
Great: 427%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 38
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 216 59 360 15.5" 1536 864 TMX1560 TL156VDXP02-0
Typical Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421 Builds (Compare 694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback