Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics306% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 07:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 75.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 378
110% 214 Pts
4-Core 743
8-Core 1,464
130% 1,104 Pts
64-Core 3,401
210% 3,401 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Lighting 461
Reflection 441
Parallax 514
376% 472 fps
MRender 575
Gravity 380
Splatting 274
319% 410 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 306%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$353
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 523
Write 494
Mixed 463
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.1
226% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,737
Write 2,688
Mixed 2,010
552% 2,478 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 95.4
328% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,596
DQ Write 1,382
DQ Mixed 1,494
1,118% 1,491 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6600C32 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
MC Read 138
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 72.3
261% 91.2 GB/s
SC Read 49.5
SC Write 71.6
SC Mixed 53.5
166% 58.2 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 237%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 30 218 60 144 27" 2560 1440 GSM5BB4 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical PRIME X670-P WIFI Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 327%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 334%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback