Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 00:29
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$197
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 213
2-Core 424
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 735
8-Core 1160
117% 948 Pts
64-Core 1,431
89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 109%
Great: 120%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Nvidia(10DE 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.3% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 51.7
Parallax 43.7
37% 46.9 fps
MRender 51.9
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 45.7
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 39%
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.70
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 14.8
6% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.5
13% 15 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP FX900 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.A.8.P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2527 2638 2631 2639 1596 592 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,965
Write 2,650
Mixed 2,240
SusWrite 2,104
559% 2,490 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 55.2
290% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,299
DQ Write 1,490
DQ Mixed 168
466% 986 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 394%
Great: 394%
HP EX900 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: V0714C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 1582 1581 1582 1573 1584 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1587
Mixed 1,121
SusWrite 1,579
327% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 31.6
239% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 1,264
DQ Mixed 512
526% 838 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 270%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
145% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 52
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 48.1
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 48.1
141% 49.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 145%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E
Typical TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $717
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback