Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X442UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X442UF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X442UF
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '23 at 03:13
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 51 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 126 48% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 222 27% 209 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX130 14,117 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1121) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.26% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 7.8 Parallax 8.7 3% 6.9 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 7.1 6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.26% Great: 10%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 409 Write 292 Mixed 264 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 22.3 75% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 194 159% 228 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 12GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 21.2 Write 7 Mixed 15.7 17% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.7 157% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 Kingston 9905711-017.A00G 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	13.9"	1536 864	CMN14A7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X442UF Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X442UF

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	76x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	41x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	82x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	35x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $64Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	9x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	32x
8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 1x4GBMicronBench 40%, 788 samples	7x
M471A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 138 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $64

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359