Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemSamsung 550XCJ/550XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XCJ-KF1BR
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 88.5
40% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 223
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C834) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.4
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 8
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 51 50 53 42 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 24.4
Write 155
Mixed 128
SusWrite 56.1
21% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 9.8
33% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 98.9
82% 117 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
821GB free
Firmware: JU003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 55 49 65 74 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 17.9
Write 31.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 65.4
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 0194 SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 60 23" 1280 720 SAM071E SMBX2350
Typical 550XCJ/550XCR Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback