PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar A10N-8800E (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190724 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '23 at 06:42 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
35.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asmedia ASMT1051 126GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 107 147 164 157 166 MB/s
|
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 94 92 96 96 MB/s
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9 5.6 8.2 13 6.8 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba StorE HDD 802GB
2TB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 24 22 21 24 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 3 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 62 | 44 | 0 | 84.6" | 1280 720 | VES3700 55UHD_LCD_TV |
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 53x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |