Biostar A10N-8800E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-8800E  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 06:42
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 98.4
39% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 148
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 41.1
35% 43.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 36
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmedia ASMT1051 126GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 107 147 164 157 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
Read 152
Write 179
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 138
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 8.5
29% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 18.4
14% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 26%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 94 92 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 85.6
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 92.7
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 84%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9 5.6 8.2 13 6.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 100
Write 10.4
Mixed 12
SusWrite 8.4
29% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
43% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 48%
Toshiba StorE HDD 802GB
2TB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 24 22 21 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 23.9
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 22
36% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
43% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 3 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 15.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 44 0 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 55UHD_LCD_TV
Typical A10N-8800E Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-8800E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback