Microelectronics G358

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicroelectronics G358  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ax
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 02:07
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$64
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 579
57% 467 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 150A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 104
Parallax 67.9
69% 85.5 fps
Gravity 81
Splatting 72.8
68% 76.9 fps
Poor: 65% Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme addlink M.2 PCIE G4x4 NVMe 2TB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1545 1546 1543 1517 1127 1164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1260
Write 2217
Mixed 1,203
SusWrite 1,407
345% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 52.6
172% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 387
317% 460 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 212%
Great: 525%
Fanxiang S880 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: SN11273
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,243
Write 2298
Mixed 2,057
492% 2,199 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 59.8
202% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 572
412% 539 MB/s
Poor: 245% Great: 611%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 105
63% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 29,104
Mixed 66.6
10,422% 14,585 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 35.3
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1296 759 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical G358 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Microelectronics G358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback