Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 20:25
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 63.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
88% 169 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 982
95% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,367
85% 1,367 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 10.8
8% 37.1 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 10
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,201
Write 3,697
Mixed 2,331
756% 3,410 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 94.9
353% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,233
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,137
850% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 245% Great: 479%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
26GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 82 89 94 93 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 83.5
Write 87.1
Mixed 32
SusWrite 90.1
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Avant J641GU42J2320NL 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 12.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 12.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1536 864 AUOAF90
Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback