Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics9.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540-$70
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 43.7
1-Core 11
2-Core 38.2
21% 31 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 66.1
7% 54.2 Pts
64-Core 33.4
2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 14.8
9% 13.9 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 20 57 74 84 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 62.3
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0370 SyncMaster
Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback