Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 18:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 811
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,213
75% 1,213 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Sapphire(174B E324) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 74.3
46% 64 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 41.9
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 2TB
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 258 253 284 256 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 238 239 264 256 239 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 341
Write 365
Mixed 312
SusWrite 240
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 9
29% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 39.6
30% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 122%
WDC WDBA3V5000AN 500GB
63GB free
Firmware: 2112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 258 249 277 256 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
Read 472
Write 462
Mixed 516
SusWrite 249
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.3
16% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
167GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 105 107 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 130
Write 107
Mixed 97
SusWrite 105
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
807GB free
Firmware: 4004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 150 160 157 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 170
Mixed 98.4
SusWrite 155
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 99%
Lexar JumpDrive 32GB
24GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 225
Write 32.3
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 31.8
80% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 10% 10 173 25 60 72.3" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $563
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback