PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B450M AORUS ELITE (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20230608 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '23 at 16:51 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.37
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 284 281 274 261 256 MB/s
|
80%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
639GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 134 137 136 132 MB/s
|
85%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 131 132 125 129 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0826
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 137 138 137 136 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
hp x304m 64GB
43GB free, PID fc40
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 10 7.6 10 11 7.7 MB/s
|
9.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 31.6" | 1280 720 | ACR0507 EB321HQU C |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 199x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 77x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 51x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 50x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $361 |