Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '23 at 02:50
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 54 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 91 36% 59.9 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 226 24% 194 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB 29,078 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 849GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 252 231 224 208 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 487 Write 294 Mixed 314 SusWrite 233 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 8.4 28% 9.57 MB/s	DQ Read 522 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 436 332% 452 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 310%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 237GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 117 116 110 117 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.5% Below average	Read 179 Write 125 Mixed 156 SusWrite 121 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 6.1 23% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 205 154% 204 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 582GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 59 59 58 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 80.6 Write 46.2 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 60.4 42% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 62%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 87 82 85 86 90 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 135 Write 106 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 87.2 69% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 85%
TEAM T25 3E2512G 512GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 120GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	Read 53.3 Write 28.8 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 1.5 35% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.6 198% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 90%
WDC WD32 00BEKT-60PVMT0 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 48GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.7 4 4.5 5 4.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.15% Terrible	Read 28.7 Write 29.4 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 4.4 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 27%
HITACHI HTS543232A7A384 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 297GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 24 23 22 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.9% Very poor	Read 51.8 Write 28.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 23.1 40% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 25%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 315GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.9 9.6 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 50.4 Write 27 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 9.7 34% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	17	11	64	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C7H270-CG-ML Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	5x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	3x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R9 M360AMDBench 9%, 1,374 samples	2x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	2x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	2x

SSD
TM8FPE001T 1TBT-createBench 216%, 220 samples	3x
Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)WD $154Bench 131%, 14,088 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GBCorsairBench 71%, 16,770 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16