Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 06:01
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 174
2-Core 341
106% 200 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,296
117% 983 Pts
64-Core 2,235
138% 2,235 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Gigabyte(1458 4037) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 256
Parallax 293
233% 278 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 238
Splatting 177
192% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1745 384 61 422 51 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,187
Write 1,476
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 451
249% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 92.3
310% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,116
863% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 226%
Great: 342%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM12.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 949 904 892 971 968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,617
SusWrite 970
339% 1,501 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 66.7
252% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,682
DQ Write 1,507
DQ Mixed 1,557
1,178% 1,582 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 268%
Great: 326%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 250 259 264 251 256 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 228
Write 205
Mixed 103
SusWrite 255
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 1.4
61% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 5.7
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 3.6
5% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 239 251 256 240 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 231
Write 216
Mixed 102
SusWrite 243
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 1.5
52% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.9
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.4
3% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 44%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
89GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 221 224 225 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 206
Mixed 147
SusWrite 219
269% 201 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1.4
534% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3.6
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.3
391% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 225
Mixed 98.3
214% 168 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.5
383% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.3
382% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 234
Write 230
Mixed 128
244% 197 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.8
483% 5.83 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.4
407% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 213
Write 218
Mixed 106
221% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.6
398% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
446% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 227
Write 222
Mixed 144
247% 198 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 2
481% 5.67 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
414% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4U1632161DCW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 72.8
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 31.3
131% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 29.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 119%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 120 27" 1280 720 ACR0632 Acer X27
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,004
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback