Samsung 750XFG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 750XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XFG-KB1AR
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 18:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 31.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 187
55% 107 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 459
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 21
Parallax 24.7
18% 22.4 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 31
Splatting 20
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 653
Write 712
Mixed 599
146% 655 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 30.2
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 633
445% 569 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 36.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1536 864 KDB0526
Typical 750XFG Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback