MSI MS-176K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive12.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GX70 3BE
MotherboardMSI MS-176K  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5750M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 5.9
2-Core 8.3
3% 7.1 Pts
4-Core 15.5
8-Core 18.4
2% 17 Pts
64-Core 18.1
1% 18.1 Pts
Poor: 21% Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GMCS 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSXAN104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 60 65 67 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.2% Very poor
Read 102
Write 78.1
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 66.1
19% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 4.3
13% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 84%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
610GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 37 38 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 43.1
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 38.5
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 68%
Mass Storage Device 960GB
868GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 11 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Read 11
Write 12.4
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 10.3
16% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata MIF4D1D167HZ1J 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 713
6% 713 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 2 2 64 0" 1920 1080
Typical MS-176K Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-176K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback