Medion Erazer P6679 MD60333

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer P6679 MD60333 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15KHN
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160914
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 01:32
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 179 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 272 36% 271 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 16 Parallax 6.62 6% 9.88 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 13.8 8% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD00.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 406 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 246 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 89 89 214 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327697 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 902	49% Average	Read 186 Write 306 Mixed 397 67% 296 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 10.8 65% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 10.7 28% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032VS 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 244GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 36.8 Mixed 36.5 47% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.21 55% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB 6,821 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16