Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230210
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 11:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 166
54% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 401
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.05
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 11.2
5% 9.33 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 481 461 463 456 463 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 542
Write 418
Mixed 443
SusWrite 460
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 25.8
92% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 354
244% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 18 70 58 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0B14
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback