bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory10.4 GB free of 13.9512 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 923 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 172
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 222
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 136GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 27 27 31 35 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 70.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 31.8
14% 61 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 19.8
80% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 15.3
13% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 60%
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 94GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 24 22 26 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 67
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 27.4
13% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 29.8
90% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 32.6
24% 32.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 71GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 13312 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 38.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 28.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 22 32 0" 1920 923
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback