Asus B85-PLUS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85-PLUS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 199 65% 118 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 358 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 6 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 204 184 169 160 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 234 Mixed 243 SusWrite 186 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 41.9 164% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 225 190% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 128%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 379GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 72 73 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 72.2 Write 69 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 72.9 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GET.CPZ0C 0112 78.B1GET.9KZ0C 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	45	60	23"	1280 720	DELF045 DELL E2313H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85-PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS R2.0

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	6x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GTX 1060 6GBNvidiaBench 56%, 56,417 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x
G5 BICS4 500GBSandiskBench 89%, 7,142 samples	3x
T253T2256G0C101 256GBBench 66%, 64 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB DDR3 1600 8G 16GBHynixBench 57%, 9 samples	4x
78.B1GET.9KZ0C 0112 78.B1GET.CPZ0C 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 4 samples	3x
RMR5030KQ68F9F1600 Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16