Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 346
110% 204 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,320
118% 1,000 Pts
64-Core 2,146
133% 2,146 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
Palit(1569 F278) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 266
Parallax 214
184% 235 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 154
Splatting 126
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 155%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 66 36 73 30 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 492
Write 420
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 53.7
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 30.5
120% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 27.6
42% 86 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 91%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
573GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2386 1787 1319 1813 1790 1666 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,826
Write 3,288
Mixed 3,031
SusWrite 1,794
617% 2,734 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 111
363% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,262
949% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 392%
Great: 477%
Team TM8FPD512G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: H220527a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2318 2217 1815 618 627 626 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,161
Write 2,416
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 1370
438% 1,946 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 88.3
305% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,025
754% 981 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 307%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 40.7
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 40.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27" 1920 1080 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $955
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback