Asus X550WAK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus X550WAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550WAK
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141222
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 23:27
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5100 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 44.1
18% 30.4 Pts
4-Core 61.1
8-Core 69.7
9% 65.4 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Asus(1043 17AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 68 70 63 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 75.8
Write 81.1
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 68.4
45% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB H5TC4G83AFR-PBA 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO20EC
Typical X550WAK Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550WAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback