bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 465
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 174
Parallax 184
152% 181 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 136
Splatting 116
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 416 432 467 468 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 452
Mixed 417
SusWrite 387
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 39.8
130% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
551GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 69 59 86 154 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 239
Write 220
Mixed 187
SusWrite 94.2
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 10.4
52% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 18.9
30% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2115 200GB
118GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 17
SusWrite 27.1
31% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
17% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33393142314737334248302D434B3020 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 34
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback