HP 280 G2 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 280 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5E
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210428
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 06:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 193
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 341
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B5E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.6 7.3 8.3 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 345
Write 238
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 7.8
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 21.1
70% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 93.6
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 47.2
39% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39%
Great: 99%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB
289GB free, PID 00db
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 31.7
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 33.5
47% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
21GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 77.9
Mixed 32.4
88% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.4
126% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Sony Storage Media 32GB
29GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.6 6.8 6.9 6.8 7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 103
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.9
24% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Mixed 0
269% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 13.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G2 MT Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback