MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 19:37
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 265-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 33.5
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 41.8
24% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 73.1
8-Core 64.2
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 71
4% 71 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
MSI(1462 3355) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 34.5
29% 34.8 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 84.1
Write 83.5
Mixed 63.7
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 5.7
23% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 8.7
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 10.9
9% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
325GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 32.5
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF1600C10D3/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 7
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback