Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 13:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 147
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 414
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 78.8
47% 66.1 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 45.6
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 149 117 132 133 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 470
Write 428
Mixed 303
SusWrite 159
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 44.6
144% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 39.9
69% 140 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
161GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 536 407 300 299 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 649
Write 549
Mixed 555
SusWrite 395
120% 537 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 58.6
191% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 468
347% 460 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 130%
Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
556GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 44 48 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 150
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 45.8
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.4
226% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 44 48 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 134
Write 152
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 45.9
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
180% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 792GB
737GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 44 48 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 106
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 45.8
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.3
220% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $489
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback