Asrock X299M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X299M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 239
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 936
84% 710 Pts
64-Core 2,002
124% 2,002 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 174
Parallax 163
152% 174 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 468 469 475 475 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 436
SusWrite 472
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 44.9
146% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 487
Write 476
Mixed 299
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 42.8
145% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 176
180% 293 MB/s
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB
173GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 467 468 475 452 447 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 494
Write 474
Mixed 456
SusWrite 463
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 47
152% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 129%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
415GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 97.5
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB
28GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.1 1.4 1.4 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.5
5% 6.03 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX2666C13/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2600, 2600, 2600, 2600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 30.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X299M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback