Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.8 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20% Very poor
Memory 29.2
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 66.8
33% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 63.6
8-Core 61.3
8% 62.4 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 36
Parallax 30.8
31% 34.9 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 23.7
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 163 161 48 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 160
Mixed 154
SusWrite 134
114% 154 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3.2
585% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 7GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 4928 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback