Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 27.7
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 116
42% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 147
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 17E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 4.8
4% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ3 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 60 82 119 96 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 306
Write 292
Mixed 261
SusWrite 105
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 20.4
63% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 164
128% 179 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 108%
Micron CT2000X 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 125 245 336 350 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 303
Write 423
Mixed 319
SusWrite 305
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 15.5
47% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 116
86% 112 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 3.9
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback